I never once mentioned kids. you seem pretty focused on them though. did daddy touch you in your special place when you were a kid

i mean are you trying to go full retard now to avoid arguing a point and pretend it was a troll all along?


are people expected to believe you are actually capable of winning this argument you just dont want to?

am not trying anything. you're retarded, your argument is based on a gigantic pyramid of bullshit that goes completely against common sense. you keep bringing up 8 years old as if they were even in this thing at all.

15-16-17 = should be allowed to do whatever. We try them as adults constantly, but obviously they are not grown up enough to decide if they want to fuck or not someone else. Fortunately, your hypocrite puritan way is not the prevalent one in the world. It is socially unacceptable to be a virgin at 18. You're socially unacceptable so this is why this whole thing hits close to home. I get it.

maybe this can be used as an example how ivory tower some people can be and god forbid they can't make policy changes

wat

as in disconnected from reality m8. forbid everything because <idea> even though reality is quite fucking different.

the past ~10 pages are a p good example of this

whos side are you on tho

you can always argue against legal personhood up till at least 14 here. im sure there is also some leeway.


and im not really sure what common sense leads you to make the argument that sex is fine for 12-14 year olds. and im not even convinced that a distinction can be made between most 14 yos and 16 yos.

you trying to insist im trying to turn people into sexless clergy is also completely retarded. ive said about a million times im not against sex and ill say now im not against polygamy or SM or pretty much any other sexual practice that has generally been deemed socially unacceptable.

you just cant give consent to sexual relations under a certain age. this is even recognised by law. a big reason why i imagine it isnt firmly prosecuted and why in the melbourne statute there is the exemption of kids within 2 years is clearly because of 1. the unfavorable outcome of indicting masses of kids 2. it was relatively frequent in the past to have arranged marriages between children aged as low as 12...



but id better go back to my ivory tower, where kids are fully capable of dealing with all the issues pertaining to sexual intercourse. im clearly delusional to assume they operate at diminished capacity compared to adults partaking in the same acts.




yes i literally get it, some of you had sex while you were young, some of you wish you did and pretend you do... that doesnt make it right.........

side of don't be fucking retarded

Who cares if they're mature enough though? Some people stay plain retarded all their life, if their retardation doesn't spill over and adversely affects my life what do I care? I owe them nothing.