Should there be a deadline in which if chunky hasn't responded then he will be deemed a coward who is not manly enough to step inside the rIng and is instead deemed as hiding in fear of defeat.

although about the dying hair thing. Chunky has no hair to dye, so isn't that a moot penalty?

Am awake. Also not wasting my time, I got far too much shit on this week. (Mooting competition and start of classes again

edit: whatever, at the very least I can't spend time posting until after the moot on Wednesday



I shave my head for summer, guess what time of year it is....



At the end of the day this is kinda stupid though because no matter what happens, mini irl is still a 22yo who's too afraid/immature/kid to be with a woman and I don't get what internet burn possibly trumps that.

look at this fucking coward.



you dont need to worry buddy, you can just send nrom and soldat one of your "lets all neg bomb minigin cos he takes this way too seriously" pms. youll be fine.

IT WILL NOT WORK.

God Speed in the Dome though

while chunky is off being a baby, anyone wanna be his second?

Minigin, the reason I don't need to worry is because I have a virgin calling me out over the internet...

Being a virgin has little to do with posting quality or intelligence m8

dont you wanna add that you have done kickboxing so if i ever met you irl youd beat me up?

No, but how do take a threat/someone calling you out seriously when it's done over the internet and by a virgin... I honestly just can't.

Although that seriously is something real for me, it goes further. Arguing with Minigin is honestly like arguing with a child a lot of the time, not in terms of his posting, but his assumptions about the world and how things he hasn't experienced actually work. He tends to base a lot of arguments from 'legal logic', from what he's learned from uni. However, he downplays the importance of experience massively. The greatest minds in the world would never downplay the importance of experience, yet minigin would. And minigin, in a lot of our arguments it's not just the fact I've done 'kickboxing'. (edit: were just personal experiences here) The experience of actually having very intimate relationships where you pretty much live with the other person and can't just think about yourself all the time, the experience of being fully independent where I have to pay my way through the world, pay my bills, do my own shopping, organise my own bills/taxes/cars registration (do you even own a car and did you buy it with money earned yourself?), the experience of having very close people to you falling victim to a heroin/drug addictions.

The number one thing out of all these however, is the experience of actually living out in the world on your own and the relationships you form with other people who have done the same. Even now I find the relationships I have with friends who live at home are somewhat different to those that don't live at home. It's not that it's exceptionally hard to live out of home, but it is vastly different from living at home and having the little things, like buying fucking toothpaste, done for you.

You might be asking why I'm bringing all these things up? It's because like I said at the start, I much prefer to talk/argue with people about love & life after they have, at the very least, become independent and formed intimate (and yes, sexual) relationships with other human beings because in my experience it is then that people's views for life tend to form. I've actually heard people who share many of your views except it's generally from people who haven't actually become independent and almost always their views and assumptions about the world change once this happens.

This is why I say I see arguing with you like arguing with a child who hasn't experience the world, because you haven't done at least 2 things.
1: Moved out on your own.
2: Had sexual relationships ie: Very intimiate relationships