EUROPEAN PPL RALLY NOW

Ottersmacker · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:04 pm

Nexus Kinnon wrote:

"nigger quotas"

i have heard of nigger (or gender tbh, all quotas are retarded, equal rights = equal fights) quotas in various places, for example when entering university. maybe there are entrance tests, evaluation of previous results etc - to me it seems reasonable that all of the potential students would compete with everyone in these areas on a fair playing field.

but then someone decides that there should be, say, a 25% quota to appear 'diverse' and 'multicultural'.

so suddenly the regular person is not competing with 100% of the pool, but only 75%, because 25% are getting a free pass (regardless of how fucking useless they may be, they will rank above anyone in regular competition). how is this fair?

am i wrong in my understanding of this?

Nexus Kinnon · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:06 pm

"nigger quotas"

Nrom · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:07 pm

Nrom wrote:

Globalization is the way things are going. Invoking nationalism would do nothing to solve Europe's issues. Only Germany and France stand to benefit from dropping from EU and not even that. They'd turn into protectionist states again, and whatever benefit they get from dropping the euro would mean jackshit.

Just because things are fucked up economically, doesnt mean EU has a lot of great things going for it, one of them is the attempt to put behind the retardation behind nationalism. Its a flawed system, but its the right way to go. I wish we had something like that in Latin America, and in the next administration, is the way its most likely to move for us.

And yeah, cool stance. Niggers are for Europe what latins are for the US, and southeast asians are for China/Japan. They do many jobs the receiving countries workers won't. They are ostracized from local culture so they don't adapt well and keep their ways. When inmigrants dont adapt well to their new countries, its as much the inmigrants fault as whomever receives them.

If the rich countries pushed agressively for economic and social reform, improvement of quality of life and education in the poorer ones, you wouldnt have niggers in your countries at all. Saying "WELL WHY WOULD I CARE!!" is also saying "WELL I DONT CARE BUT ITS GON RAIN NIGGAHS ON MY LAWN"

Nexus Kinnon · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:07 pm

cue "whats wrong with it NEXUS?? its just a word!! THEY (the blacks) USE IT ALL THE TIME!!"

Nexus Kinnon · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:08 pm

Nrom wrote:

Globalization is the way things are going. Invoking nationalism would do nothing to solve Europe's issues. Only Germany and France stand to benefit from dropping from EU and not even that. They'd turn into protectionist states again, and whatever benefit they get from dropping the euro would mean jackshit.

Just because things are fucked up economically, doesnt mean EU has a lot of great things going for it, one of them is the attempt to put behind the retardation behind nationalism. Its a flawed system, but its the right way to go. I wish we had something like that in Latin America, and in the next administration, is the way its most likely to move for us.

And yeah, cool stance. Niggers are for Europe what latins are for the US, and southeast asians are for China/Japan. They do many jobs the receiving countries workers won't. They are ostracized from local culture so they don't adapt well and keep their ways. When inmigrants dont adapt well to their new countries, its as much the inmigrants fault as whomever receives them.

If the rich countries pushed agressively for economic and social reform, improvement of quality of life and education in the poorer ones, you wouldnt have niggers in your countries at all. Saying "WELL WHY WOULD I CARE!!" is also saying "WELL I DONT CARE BUT ITS GON RAIN NIGGAHS ON MY LAWN"

Nexus Kinnon · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:08 pm

nr0m goodpostin again

Nrom · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:12 pm

I want to summarize Ottersmackers post in one youtube video:

Ottersmacker · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:17 pm

I love the durka-durr but I wasn't posting about that actually. I have nothing against the movement of workforce and indeed do agree with the point of "they will do the jobs our workers won't/can't/whatever". But my reservations would be not harming overall equality (e.g when i bash race or gender quotas it has nothing to do with immigration, i bash them because i see them as unnecessary from an equality standpoint), and also demanding some degree of respect for the local cultural space of whereever anyone decides to move to.

For example not bothering to learn the local language etc would be something I would never think of if I decided to go and reside in some country for a longer period of time. But it happens and next thing you know there's turkish ghettos in germany, muslims in norway (iirc?) saying 'fuck off police this is sharia district' etc.

//Also adding that I do understand that people arriving in a new cultural space and overall system of society have a higher tendency to get 'in trouble' and when interpreting whichever statistics (e.g (randum numbers) "immigrants are only 3% of our workforce, but commit 50% of not doing paperwork correctly!") related to this, that fact should be taken into account before labeling people as criminals and whatnot.

Nrom · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:25 pm

Quotas exist for a reason. If it wasn't for them, there would literally be no women in most developed world's workforces because employers would have no reason to employ them. After years of quotas forcing companies no choice but to employ them, and with possitive results, women find it easier (but aren't still in equal conditions compared to men) to get employment.

As for inmigrant integration, its a problem to try integrate communities that have already been pushed to the fringes of society. Its not exactly easy to demand people to do stuff if at first you send them off to live under a bridge.

Halarach · **Posted:** Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:26 pm

Reality checks :

Integration of foreigners takes time and you need to set some limits otherwise there will be some kind of cultural clash, regardless of how you believe this is "good", "bad", "modern" or "retro", reality check one.

In most poor countries there are a lot of tensions between ethnies, neighbours, etc so lol at poors telling us how we should be so open minded and accept the whole earth, reality check 2.

If our countries instead of fucking around making war and shit to own oil and diamonds had helped the poor countries to develop sanely, there wouldn't be that much people that would want to escape starving and it would autoregulate, reality check 3.

Also I believe this "big issue" with outsourcing atm, will autoregulate at some point when living standards will have raised enough in poor countries. Last tuesday whole india striked and stopped working, asking for a minimum salaray and job protection. Internet helps this going faster cause people can easily compare.

EUROPEAN PPL RALLY NOW

Who is online