In the land where the alt is king, who is Crendraven?

Nrom · **Posted:** Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:53 pm

Vegas owns and ur a scrub if u havent played it

Raimo · **Posted:** Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:13 pm

Nexus Kinnon wrote:

Kimura Masahiko wrote:

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

Nrom wrote:

But Bethesda makes good games

Nrom wrote:

Bethesda

Nrom wrote:

good games

lol.

(Morrowind and F3 had their good bits though - but even in it's terribuggy release state FNV trumps F3 tbh)

Fake ed for Norm: Yeah but vegas was not Bethesda

Nexus Kinnon · **Posted:** Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:13 pm

also fallout is a bad game

((

Raimo · **Posted:** Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:56 pm

Nexus Kinnon wrote:

also fallout is a bad game

((

M8 don't troll Fallout and Fallout 2 are awesome

Suitonia · **Posted:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:30 am

RIP Black Isle Studios, when people actually made games because they wanted to put out a decent product and cared about making a good game as opposed to how quickly they can push out the latest CGI animal movie game

Shiroi_Okami · **Posted:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:33 am

Old games are much like old music, they are often simply better than their newer counterparts. When making games was about making games and not about production efficiency, profit margins, and marketing

CHED · **Posted:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:55 am

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

Old games are much like old music, they are often simply better than their newer counterparts. When making games was about making games and not about production efficiency, profit margins, and marketing

ye ppl used to make games just because rite?

Shiroi_Okami · **Posted:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:04 am

CHED wrote:

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

Old games are much like old music, they are often simply better than their newer counterparts. When making games was about making games and not about production efficiency, profit margins, and marketing

ye ppl used to make games just because rite?

Back then games were sold on their merits, not on bribed reviewers, advertising budgets, or because they were attached to the latest pixar film. These days a game does not need to be good to sell well, and this is the whole problem with modern video gaming

CHED · **Posted:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:41 am

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

CHED wrote:

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

Old games are much like old music, they are often simply better than their newer counterparts. When making games was about making games and not about production efficiency, profit margins, and marketing

ye ppl used to make games just because rite?

Back then games were sold on their merits, not on bribed reviewers, advertising budgets, or because they were attached to the latest pixar film. These days a game does not need to be good to sell well, and this is the whole problem with modern video gaming

m8 it does sell well tho otherwise why would they bother

Shiroi_Okami · **Posted:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:44 am

CHED wrote:

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

CHED wrote:

Shiroi_Okami wrote:

Old games are much like old music, they are often simply better than their newer counterparts. When making games was about making games and not about production efficiency, profit margins, and marketing

ye ppl used to make games just because rite?

Back then games were sold on their merits, not on bribed reviewers, advertising budgets, or because they were attached to the latest pixar film. These days a game does not need to be good to sell well, and this is the whole problem with modern video gaming

m8 it does sell well tho otherwise why would they bother

Thats my point. They can put effort in and their game will sell well. or they can not really bother, put out a game which sells almost as well because of :Mass Media:, and then put out a hashed up sequel 6 months later and make twice the money instead of making one excellent game

In the land where the alt is king, who is Crendraven?

Who is online